PNY CS900 vs Crucial BX500

NOTE : Product prices, availability, ratings and save money information are accurate as of the date/time indicated on post time (as seen right bellow the tittle) and are subject to change. Any price, ratings, availability and save money information displayed on Amazon Site at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

PNY CS900 vs Crucial BX500 are entry-level SSDs that are standing in a similar price range. They both are targeted at people who want to upgrade from old HDDs and those who seek affordable storage. Nevertheless, there is a notable difference in their performance, so make sure that you choose the model that will give you the best value!

Continue reading to find out further about:
– The available capacity options on each model
– The technologies and features of PNY CS900 and Crucial BX500
– The software applications that are included with each model
– The performance of PNY CS900 vs Crucial BX500
– Which entry-level SSD that is generally more recommended

PNY CS900: Overview
Right from the start, it is really clear that PNY CS900 is aimed at the entry-level market. It is selling points are the typical benefits of upgrading from an HDD to an SSD, including increased transfer rates and faster boot-up speeds. To make it even more attractive, the company has backed it with a 3-year warranty. See also: PNY CS900 vs CS1311

Of course, it comes with a very aggressive pricing. Thus, PNY CS900 is a highly viable option if you need an affordable way to expand your storage. The company claims that this SSD is 30x more robust than the typical HDDs since it doesn’t have moving parts. PNY CS900 is compatible with most platforms, including Windows and Mac, so it should be able to work without any complicated set-up or configuration.

When it was first released, PNY CS900 only had three capacity options: 120GB, 240GB, and 480GB. However, the technology has advanced enough to make NAND chips significantly more affordable. As the effect, the company has managed to introduce a 960GB capacity option. All of the capacities come with very competitive prices.

Now comparing the features of PNY CS900 vs Crucial BX500, there are some notable similarities. First of all, both are SSDs with the 2.5-inch form factor. They have 7mm-thick enclosures, so they are compatible with most slim notebooks that are quite popular nowadays. They do have their own 9mm adapters in order to fit snugly in full-sizes systems.

PNY CS900: Features
Although many companies have introduced SATA-based SSDs in the 1TB range and even higher, PNY CS900 still remains as a solid option with the 6Gbps SATA interface. The idea is, PNY CS900 is meant for budget-conscious users who want to get a high performance per cost ratio. However, if you are ready to spend a serious amount of money, there are alternatives with higher transfer rates and higher capacity options.

Despite being an entry-level model, the build quality of PNY CS900 feels reassuringly good. The housing is lightweight yet solid and shock-proof. Being an SSD, it obviously doesn’t have any moving part, so it is guaranteed to be a lot more robust than HDDs. It won’t give you a sudden breakdown, and the 3-year warranty is a fine addition that increases our confidence in the build quality.

There is no surprise that PNY CS900 is built with TLC NAND chips. Compared to MLC and SLC variants, the TLC NAND chips are cheaper to manufacture. It also enables the SSD to have a large capacity without expanding the physical size. TLC is less reliable and less durable than MLC and SLC, but it should be good enough for most end consumers.

There is no special feature in PNY CS900. It doesn’t have a built-in security implementation like an encryption engine or the TCG OPAL compliance. This is totally fine for an entry-level model. However, it does come with the Acronis True Image HD data migration software, which is quite useful if you need to transfer data from your old drive to the new one.PNY CS900: Performance
So, how is the performance of PNY CS900 vs Crucial BX500? Interestingly, different capacity options have different read and write speeds. In the lower capacities, PNY CS900 is faster. But in the highest capacity, Crucial BX500 is faster.

In general, PNY CS900’s performance is in the medium-low range. It is among the finest entry-level models, but it is still nowhere as powerful as the more expensive PNY CS2211 or Samsung 860 Evo. The biggest benefit that PNY CS900 offers is the excellent balance between affordability and performance.

When the 120GB model is tested, the sequential read and write speeds are 362MB/s and 247MB/s. These are actually lower than Crucial BX500 of the same capacity. However, the random read and write speeds are significantly higher at 27.9MB/s and 70.3MB/s. The random mixed IO speed is also better at around 26.2MB/s.

The same things happened with the 240GB and 480GB models; PNY CS900 is slower than Crucial BX500 in sequential reads and writes, but much faster when dealing with random operations. The gap between the 480GB models is especially huge. PNY CS900 can reach 30.3MB/s on random mixed IO tasks, while Crucial BX500 is struggling in sub-20MB/s.

Interestingly, the 960GB model of PNY CS900 hasn’t been able to keep the lead. The overall performance is still good, and it is still a bit faster on random mixed IO tasks. However, the 960GB model of Crucial BX500 is able to beat it in sequential read, sequential write, random read, and random write with some convincing margins.

Crucial BX500: Overview
Now, let us take a look at Crucial BX500. It is the successor of the BX300 series, which was fairly popular in the entry-level category. Just like the previous model, Crucial BX500 is still a streamlined no-frill SSD for people with limited budget.

Although Crucial BX500 does not offer much of an upgrade from its predecessor, it is still a highly viable choice for people who want to replace their old HDDs or expand their existing storage. It is affordable, and it has good capacity options.

Obviously, the performance is nowhere comparable to the more expensive SSD models. But it is already noticeably faster than HDDs, while also offering good robustness and lifetime. Not to mention that Crucial BX500 is among the most cheapest SSD options in the market.

Pricing for NAND chips has plummeted greatly in the recent months. And because of that, SSD manufacturers are now able to sell entry-level products with high capacity options. This, of course, has increased the demand, too, so it is a good thing that Crucial BX500 comes with 120GB, 240GB, 480GB, and 960GB capacity options.

The company is confident in the build quality, as indicated by Crucial BX500’s 3-year limited warranty. They will cover any manufacturing defect found in the product. However, the warranty is only valid until the maximum total bytes written (TBW) is reached. Most home owners won’t need to worry about reaching the TBW because it is extremely high, but extremely heavy uses may reduce the lifetime.

Crucial BX500: Features
So, what’s inside Crucial BX500? This SSD runs on an SMI SM2259XT four-channel controller. It utilizes 96 layers of 3D TLC NAND chips from Micron. The SSD is available in the 2.5-mm form factor with the 6Gbps SATA interface.

One similarity between PNY CS900 vs Crucial BX500 is neither has built-in security features. So, you won’t get an encryption engine. They are basic SSDs for basic storage needs.

Crucial BX500 does include two software applications. The first one is Acronis True Image HD for data migration and system backup. The second one is Crucial Storage Executive, which is for monitoring the SSD status, updating the firmware, and enabling or disabling the “momentum cache” feature. The company claims that this feature can increase the performance of the SSD up to 10x.

Crucial BX500: Performance
The specs sheet of Crucial BX500 claims that the maximum sequential read and write speeds are 540MB/s and 500MB/s across all capacity options. However, when tested, there are minor differences between them, with the 960GB model being the closest to the claimed speeds.

As mentioned above, Crucial BX500 is generally better than PNY CS900 in sequential operations. However, a lot of SSD operations in real life are random IO operations. This is why, in real-life scenarios, PNY CS900 will still perform faster due to having better random read and write speeds.

When tested, the 120GB model of Crucial BX500 can reach 468MB/s and 373MB/s in sequential read and write, respectively. However, the random read speed is very low at 27.5MB/s, and the random write speed is only around 42.8MB/s. In mixed random IO tasks, the average speed is really lagging around 15.3MB/s.

The same trend still applies to the 240GB and 480GB model. With the 240GB model, the average speed for mixed random IO is only around 15.6MB/s. With the 480GB model, there is some increase to 18MB/s, but this is still quite low.

With the 960GB model, Crucial BX500 is actually better than PNY CS900 in most metrics, except mixed random IO. While PNY CS900 can reach 29.7MB/s, Crucial BX500 is still limited to 24MB/s.

PNY CS900 vs Crucial BX500

- Upgrade your laptop or desktop computer and feel The difference with super Fast OS Boot times and application loads
- Exceptional performance offering up to 515MB/s seq. Read and 490MB/s seq. Write speeds
- Superior performance as compared to traditional hard drives (HDD)
- Ultra low power consumption. Backwards compatible with SATA II 3GB/s
- Boot up faster. Load files quicker. Improve overall system responsiveness
- 300% faster than a typical hard drive
- Improves battery life because it’s 45x more energy efficient than a typical hard drive
- Micron 3D NAND advancing the world's memory and storage technology for 40 years

NOTE : Product prices, availability, ratings and save money information are accurate as of the date/time indicated on post time (as seen right bellow the tittle) and are subject to change. Any price, ratings, availability and save money information displayed on Amazon Site at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

All in all, PNY CS900 is generally more recommended. It has better overall performance. Although the sequential read and write speeds are lower, it is faster in random operations. In real-life applications, it will perform better.

Share Button

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *